Thank you for serving as a judge at ATBC2025. Your role is key in maintaining the scientific rigor of our program and in ensuring that the most outstanding presentations are recognized and celebrated.

​

​

General Instructions:

 

1. Accessing the Evaluation Platform

​

To begin evaluating, click the button below to enter the evaluation platform.
You will first be prompted to enter a password. This password was sent to you by email.
 

Once inside the platform, you will be asked to enter the Abstract ID of the presentation you are judging (e.g., A-1024). This ID is available in your assigned judging sheet or the session program.

 

After submitting the ID, the system will display:

​

• Presentation title and list of authors

• Abstract summary and session information

• Evaluation form with five scoring criteria

​

You will then be able to complete and submit your evaluation. You may repeat the process to assess multiple presentations using their respective IDs.

​

​

2. Scoring Criteria

For each presentation, please score the following components on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 10 (excellent):

• Scientific Merit – Topic: Is the research question relevant and well framed?

• Scientific Merit – Methods and Results: Are the methods sound and results meaningful?

• Quality of Presentation – Communication: Is the oral/poster presentation clear and well delivered?

• Quality of Presentation – Visuals: Are slides or visuals effective, clear, and well-designed?

• Only for Bacardí Award – Relevance to Conservation: If the presenter is eligible, does the work contribute significantly to conservation efforts?

 

​

​

3. Submitting the Evaluation

Once you've filled in all scores and confirmed your eligibility:

• Click “Submit Evaluation”.

• A confirmation message will appear.

• You may then proceed to evaluate another presentation using a new Abstract ID.